As a follow-up to a previous post (woo hoo the circle returns), this Poll is to get an idea of which generic style of layout our members prefer to use.
This is not to say it's the style you have, but to find out what you prefer, whether it is what you have at home, your clubs layout, a friends layout, etc.
The two options are:
Loop; which includes any layout that can achieve continuous running in at least one direction...
Examples might be; single oval, dual-oval, over/under loop, figure-eight, dog-bone, etc.
Point-to-Point; which includes any layout that can not achieve a continuous circulation/running of trains in one direction.
If you have/prefer a combination, please select your most preferred mode of operation...
If you're a "modular" type person, that can have it any way (depending on how units combined), once again, please choose a preferred layout style.
Prefered layout style?


Re:Prefered layout style?
BryanC, whilst I understand the other options/combinations that could exist, the point of this poll is to find out if linear or circular operation is preferred...
Your example rightfully falls into "Loop", regardless of it's other operational capabilities, because it is possible to run continuously in one direction...
Although a combination may well be what exists within many layouts, we're not looking for a "[D] all of the above" type answer...
And once again, it's not a question of what you have, but what you prefer to run...
Would you rather watch trains go around and around, or back and forth?
As a note; a point-to-point layout does not have to mean shuffling back and forth on a 3' section of track... it could be two terminals, industries, yards, whatever, that are many feet apart, joined by a winding path, with sidings, spurs, etc, along the way...
The only reason Modular was included, is because the unit itself is linear, but the use of is variable within a layout, based on how they're pieced together.
I now see this may be adding confusion, so I will remove that option, leaving it as a very black and white question...

Re:Prefered layout style?
My layout consists of loops, triple track mains looping over and under each, offering a lot of action :D .
Perhaps not perfect in the real world, but that is what I like and it enables me to have continuous running of 3 or more trains and switching operations at the same time :P .


Re:Prefered layout style?
BryanC wrote:
I know what you mean, but this poll is really a carry over from a previous post, trying to find out what type of "action" people like to look at...
You're more than welcome to start a "what do you have" oriented poll... it's just this one was was oriented at "what you like"... it may or may not be the same thing (if you know what I mean :wink: )...Bryan, point taken :) but I dunno :!: I would have preferred to find out what people actually are planning or have actually built :evil:
Re:Prefered layout style?
I perfer point to point.
I get bored too easillly with trains that run around in circles chasing their tails, plus prototype trackage where trains can run in circles is almost unheard of (and with the exception of mass transit systems, a railroad can't make any money by doing that).
Paul


Re:Prefered layout style?
The quick, or the dead... (or so the saying goes)...
Bryan, you may find you'll get some indication of what you're after, from the comments in the accompanying posts... the poll is just the preference, but the comments may hold the actual...

Re:Prefered layout style?
Bryan wrote:
That's exactly why I don't think another poll is appropriate right now!
Now this is really :twisted: but I do believe it's poll and not pole. Sorry, I couldn't resist. Actually, truth be known, I did the same thing before correcting it!Bryan, you may find you'll get some indication of what you're after, from the comments in the accompanying posts... the pole is just the preference, but the comments may hold the actual...
Re:Prefered layout style?
BryanC wrote:
The answer to these questions is yes.
There are several options available. The current layout I have does have a loop on it, but I also belong to an N-trak group, and If I had to, I could pull out the oval of Unitrak I own. You can also put things up on rollers for breakin runs, but the rollers are expensive.
Eventually, I will be building a layout that will truelly be a point to point layout, without the option of running in a loop. I'm most likely moving within the next two years, so there isn't any sense in trying to build that layout now.
PaulPaul, and other point-to-point gurus: Just a matter of interest, how do you break in your new locomotives? Do you have a separate loop somewhere just for that purpose or do you have some other method?

Re:Prefered layout style?
BryanC wrote:
Oh, DUH :!: .... :roll:
English was never my best subject, but that one I know(knew)...
It must be the lack of sleep catching up to me... I didn't even catch it, just kept on typing it, despite all the correct spelling right under my nose...
My only question is, where's the Kiwi librarian, having his dig?... thought he'd be first in on one like this :P
Oh well, I don't think I do too bad on average, for an Aussie without the best of spelling skills...
Ya gotta love that [edit] button :wink:Bryan wrote:That's exactly why I don't think another poll is appropriate right now! Now this is really :twisted: but I do believe it's poll and not pole. Sorry, I couldn't resist. Actually, truth be known, I did the same thing before correcting it!Bryan, you may find you'll get some indication of what you're after, from the comments in the accompanying posts... the pole is just the preference, but the comments may hold the actual...

Re:Prefered layout style?
Boiler-man wrote:
Yeah, that sounds like what I'm running too. While it would be cool to run a point-to-point layout, I just don't have enough room to do anything that would be worthwhile to me. I have room for a 3x4 spaghetti bowl with double mains going over and under and everywhere. Totally unrealistic, but it's fun to run trains on, at least until I figure out how to comandeer the 20x32 playroom... :twisted:My layout consists of loops, triple track mains looping over and under each, offering a lot of action :D . Perhaps not perfect in the real world, but that is what I like and it enables me to have continuous running of 3 or more trains and switching operations at the same time :P .

Re:Prefered layout style?
I've become a believer in the around-the-walls style. Previous layouts (in N and back-in-the-day HO) were always "sheet layouts," ranging in size from 3x4 up to 10x8. The layout I'm building now is an around-the-walls, and I really like it. It just seems more real to me, there is abundant storage space underneath, and it still allows the room to be usable for other things. My layout room is also my office (I work from home most days, soon to be every day), and it's nice to look up from my desk to see a lashup of Erie-Builts grinding their way through Dewey towards Queen Junction, or to just take a break from dumba$$ paperwork and switch the Pittsburgh Limestone facility for a while instead :D
If I had a huge space, like a 30'x40' basement or something like that, I'd probably have a walk-in style layout with furniture, etc. up against the walls. For the average person's space, though (in my case 13' x 13' with a 7' x 9' addition), an around the walls is the way to go.

Prefered layout style
Bryan
The 'Kiwi Librarian' is very aware of the limitations and foibles of the human condition, and as a result would never, to his knowledge, delibrately make any comment on the personal attributes of others in respect of very personal things such as spelling etc. It's simply not done!!
It's also terribly impolite!
Poking fun at each other on the basis of our respective national characteristics is acceptable - we both know it's in jest, but in the area of personal limitations - definitely not on.
And yes, I am VERY thankful for the spellcheck button (even if it DOES speak 'American').
Thought you might like to know that. :D
Komata
"TVR - serving the Northern Taranaki . . . "

Re:Prefered layout style?
The way I look at it; if our dyslexic fingers/brains can mess the letters around when we put in down, then the next brain ought be capable of unshuffling it to a point of understanding what's meant...
At least I steer clear of the new IM style of spelling :shock: yikes, that take more deciphering than basic spelling errors... :?
And we know one national characteristic of American spell-checkers, is that they can't spell ;-) :lol:
Re:Prefered layout style?
I chose loop because even though my main layout is/will be an around the room shelf layout it will still be a loop. :mrgreen:
Actually I have a varieity of layout styles with the majority being some form of a loop.For instance there's the TTRAK layout (co-owned with my modeling group) the 2TRAK (ex-NTRAK co-owned with my friend Bill)the above mentioned main layout (all mine)and my small fairly portable 30"X72" N scale layout.
There is one point to point layout in my life and that will be in HO.It will replace my old N scale switching layout and will be of the same type.
Re:Prefered layout style?
Preferred layout type is point-to-point. Especially in a larger layout.
Quote:
We recently aquired a 28'x30' layout room (aka basement). The overall plan is to utilize a modular set-up of widths between 18" to 36" wrapping around the walls then into the main body of the room in a walk-in fashion. The plan is to have the two points terminate into a common staging area. So while point-to-point would be the normal mode of operation, continuous operation would be possible for public (aka non model railroading type people ).If I had a huge space, like a 30'x40' basement or something like that, I'd probably have a walk-in style layout with furniture, etc. up against the walls. For the average person's space, though (in my case 13' x 13' with a 7' x 9' addition), an around the walls is the way to go.
Re:Prefered layout style?
Preferred layout type is point-to-point. Especially in a larger layout.
Quote:
We recently aquired a 28'x30' layout room (aka basement). The overall plan is to utilize a modular set-up of widths between 18" to 36" wrapping around the walls then into the main body of the room in a walk-in fashion. The plan is to have the two points terminate into a common staging area. So while point-to-point would be the normal mode of operation, continuous operation would be possible for public (aka non model railroading type people ).If I had a huge space, like a 30'x40' basement or something like that, I'd probably have a walk-in style layout with furniture, etc. up against the walls. For the average person's space, though (in my case 13' x 13' with a 7' x 9' addition), an around the walls is the way to go.
Re:Prefered layout style?
Practically any layout I would build would have some facility for continuous running, so that trains can simply run for awhile. But I operate in a point-to-point fashion. Even on my 2 1/2'x5' layout w/three loops, I actually operate as if I am going from one place to another and back. So, I chose "point-to-point" on the poll.
---jps





Joined: 2004-02-29