Consisting order

aroc
aroc's picture
Posts: 297
Joined: 2007-02-17
nScale.net Site Supporter
No votes yet

Another question on real life applications on your layout. 

Is there any particular way that engines are ordered.  The other day I say one that was 7 engines long.  It was quite obvious that the newer higher horsepower engines were leading the way while the ones bringing up the rear where 30 years old.  Some aren't quite as obvious though.  I've seen 3 identical engines with a leased EMD in front.  I would think that the railroad would want there own leading but maybe not.

I guess what I am trying to get to is, is there a logical format for the order of the consist. 

Just one of those silly things I think about when I am on the road all day and think about.

Thanks

Eric

Anaconda, MT


--
You are what you think.


BryanC
BryanC's picture
Posts: 1308
Joined: 2005-01-26
nScale.net Forum ModeratornScale.net Site Supporter
Actually, a good question.

Actually, a good question. I've wondered the same thing myself on occasion but after seeing pictures of just about every combination possible with front to front, back to back, front to back, back to front, etc. I've given up trying to make any sense of it!

If there is some logic to it all, would someone clue us in?


--

Cheers!

Bryan C
Alligator Lines "The Eclectic Line of the South"

http://ALines.home.att.net




railohio
railohio's picture
Posts: 1007
Joined: 2004-01-02
nScale.net Forum Moderator
The logic is that it's up

The logic is that it's up to whoever is putting the consist together. Sometimes there are rules, that vary by railroad, on how this is to be accomplished. Sometimes said rules are disregarded entirely. The only rule that's widely followed is that non-powered units are to be at the end of the consist. Otherwise, the sky is the limit. Some railroads limit the total running horsepower of a consist. Some limit the total powered axles. There are some crew agreements that specify certain units, if available, are to lead and railroad rules follow these agreements. Norfolk Southern, about four years ago, used to mandate tha the lowest horsepower unit was to be leading, but this practice soon fell out of favor. There are plenty of other examples floating around out there. The best way to research this is to go right to the source. Pick up a couple railroad rule books relavent to your modeling and follow their official practices.

~BS


--
mmmmm pie!



dckuk
dckuk's picture
Posts: 223
Joined: 2003-11-17
Aren't there legal issues about toilets in some states too?

I thought I read that a certain type of toilet had to available in every train's loco, or at least the ones 'driving' or leading the pack.

Could be talking out my shorts...

Dennis


--

Post No Bills




Komata
Komata's picture
Posts: 1227
Joined: 2005-05-12
Consisting order

My few cents:

Essentially, what it comes down to is 'What is available to move the tonnage?'

A Road Foreman (or his equivalent) will use whatever motive power he has available to him to move tonnage through his section - even yard switchers if necessary.  Newness, oldness, length of service, it doesn't really matter. If its got wheels, it runs and it will move  X-number of wagons over X-miles of track and get the tonnage out of his hair, then it will be used, which is why, at 'peak-periods' you will see some strange combinations of motive power - anything to get things out and away and off his patch.

Hope this helps

Komata

"TVR - serving the Northern Taranaki . . . "

 


--

Komata

"TVR - serving the Northern Taranaki . . . " ___________________________________________




BryanC
BryanC's picture
Posts: 1308
Joined: 2005-01-26
nScale.net Forum ModeratornScale.net Site Supporter
Komata - that certainly
Komata - that certainly helps to explain some the pictures I have seen!
--

Cheers!

Bryan C
Alligator Lines "The Eclectic Line of the South"

http://ALines.home.att.net




absnut
absnut's picture
Posts: 586
Joined: 2004-01-12
nScale.net Site Supporter
I'm not aware of specific

I'm not aware of specific rules for motive power here in New England.  I have seen pictures of Bangor And Aroostook RR consists that included F3's, BL2, Geeps, E7's, and switchers.... all for road service.  Check out these pictures:

http://users.silcon.com/~lgoss/bar6844.htm

http://users.silcon.com/~lgoss/bar4041.htm

 http://users.silcon.com/~lgoss/bar46177.htm

Back when Maine Central ran both hoods and cabs, they preferred to put cabs on the points of a lash-up to give the road crew better visibility.  Again, it boils down to.... it's YOUR RR...  and you are in charge of the power!Smile


--

Dick,

Usually, when all is said and done, there's a lot more said than done!




pbender
pbender's picture
Posts: 993
Joined: 2003-12-21
nScale.net Forum Moderator
To give everyone an idea of

To give everyone an idea of where there are rules, let me quote an example from a rulebook.

The book I have in front of me is Frisco Time Tabl No 4 for the Springfield Terminal Division effective April 22, 1979.  It reads:

Quote:

MAKE UP OF LOCOMOTIVE CONSISTS

RD-SW units may be combined only with units 633-699,400 and 100 series units to a maximum of six (6) combined units, with following restrictions:

5 Units - One, two, or three RD-SW unit may be used, RD-SW unit must not be trailing unit

6 units - Not more than one (1) RD-SW unit may be used and RD-SW unit must be first or second unit of consist.

A consist of four (4) RD-SW units must not be combined with other units.

What this means is that RD-SW units (which is how frisco's GP7s were differentiated from other road units) could be included in consists with GP38ACs (units 633-662), GP38-2s (Units 663-699 and the 400 series) and GP15-1s (100 seies units) , but they were more or less restricted to being the lead unit.  This also means that you would never see the GP7s included in a consist with other frisco road power.  (They were sometimes used with switchers).

The restriction here had to do with the brake system on the GP7s.

Paul 




Michael
Michael's picture
Posts: 440
Joined: 2007-09-04
nScale.net Site Supporter
Curious: How does one
Curious: How does one acquire a rulebook?


F15IkeUSAF
F15IkeUSAF's picture
Posts: 156
Joined: 2005-03-18
Oakways?
The 3 identical units with EMD logos could have been Oakway leasing units. These units are on a power by the hour agreement with BN, BNSF now, that BN pays for the horsepower the unit generates. The maintenance and upkeep of the units is done by BN shops under the management of EMD.


turbine682
turbine682's picture
Posts: 561
Joined: 2005-03-14
Cool...

Hey Dick,

Pretty cool pics!

Thanks,

--Ed


--
For those who are about to Railroad... WE SALUTE YOU!


railohio
railohio's picture
Posts: 1007
Joined: 2004-01-02
nScale.net Forum Moderator
Rule Books

Michael wrote:
Curious: How does one acquire a rulebook?

You buy it at train show or a giant auction site or have it given to you by a benevolent railroader or former railroader.

~BS


--
mmmmm pie!



Canadian
Canadian's picture
Posts: 200
Joined: 2005-05-17
Similarly unrelated: Is
Similarly unrelated: Is there any sort of formula or something to determine how much weight a particular loco can haul?
--

-Kevin

N Scaler extrordinaire

http://www.nscalecanada.com - become a Virtual EntreperNeur today!




Komata
Komata's picture
Posts: 1227
Joined: 2005-05-12
Consisting order

As 'towing capability' is directly related to train consists, I can't see that it's off topic, so . . .

As teh 'real' roads have different  ways of calculating the towing capacity of their motive power, herewith the formulae that the Tickford Valley Railway Co (London) Ltd (TVR) (My own railway) uses: 

To determine the Absolute Pulling Power of a particular locomotive (bearing in mind that each engine is an individual):

1. Add as many wagons as necessary until the locomotive starts to wheel-spin when being driven in a straight line at a medium-low power-setting.

Remove wagons ONE AT A TIME until locomotive runs freely and doesn't spin its wheels when running in a straight line at the same power setting as before

2. Run Locomotive and load from 1. through tightest curves on layout at same power setting as used for 1.

Locomotive should either stall or wheel-spin on curve, due to inertia, side-thrusts and weight.

Remove ONE WAGON AT A TIME (as in 1.) until train runs freely through curve without stalling or wheel spinning.

3.  Run entire remaining train over steepest gradient on layout.

Train Should either stall or wheel-spin.

Repeat as for 1. until train can climb gradient without stalling or wheel-spinning.

You should now have the ideal weight for that particular locomotive.

4. Run train through shortest Crossing (Passing) Loop on the Layout.

Stop train when locomotive is in the 'Loop and clear of the Fouling Point (the point at which it would be hit by another train/wagon if one came past).

Remove any wagons at the back of the train which are either still out on the Main Line, or outside the Fouling Point at that end of the 'Loop (the point at which it would be hit by a passing train).

You now have the ideal Train Length for that  Locomotive.

Record the information for future reference.

If you so wish, (and you only have a very small fleet of locomotives) it is possible to erect Railway-type signage on the appropriate Loop ttrack to remind you what the wagon capacity is for a specific engine.

This can be as follows: 10/6  or similar and indicates that locomotive No.10 can fit 6 standard-type wagons into that particular 'Loop.

This system has been in use on the TVR for many years, and TVR Management has no reason to consider changing it.

Hope this helps

Komata

"TVR - serving the Northern Taranaki . . . " 


--

Komata

"TVR - serving the Northern Taranaki . . . " ___________________________________________




Canadian
Canadian's picture
Posts: 200
Joined: 2005-05-17
Thanks for the reply

Thanks for the reply Komata; I've done some thinking and this very logic seems to be (somewhat) prototypical as well (or so it's been justified in my mind at least).


--

-Kevin

N Scaler extrordinaire

http://www.nscalecanada.com - become a Virtual EntreperNeur today!




pbender
pbender's picture
Posts: 993
Joined: 2003-12-21
nScale.net Forum Moderator
power on a train

The prototypes usually use a "horsepower per ton" rule.   This is dependent on the type of train involved AND the terain over which the train is going... in other words, you may require 4 hp/ton to go over a mountain with an intermodal, but the same train may only require 2 hp/ton on a more flat district.

 I don't have any charts showing this in front of me, but I may have one tucked away somewhere.

Paul




Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Powered by Drupal - Modified by Todd Vaules