wig wag crossings

Trainster
Trainster's picture
Posts: 104
Joined: 2006-03-12
No votes yet

Just wondering I have seen some pics of layouts with crossings with a wig-wag signal on both sides of the track, I have also seen prototypes with only one on one side of the track, what is the norm?

 

Please advise. 


--





pbender
pbender's picture
Posts: 995
Joined: 2003-12-21
nScale.net Forum Moderator
There is no norm.While

There is no norm.

While today you almost always see a signal on both sides of the tracks, when devices like wig-wags were installed, it depended on 1) The railroad involved 2) the government involved,  3) the amount of traffic on the road in question.

In most cases the railroad is only required to put up a simple crossbuck.  Anything more than that is usually paid for by the government entity responsible for the crossing in question.  (As with rail/rail level crossings, protection at a rail/road level crossing is provided at the expense of the entity arriving LAST).

Paul




Komata
Komata's picture
Posts: 1243
Joined: 2005-05-12
wig wag crossings

Kiwi's

There were a pair of these on the old Hutt Road Level Crossing in Wellington - as far as I can determine, the only place they were ever used in New Zealand, proving that the species wasn't only confined to North America.

 Komata

"TVR - serving the Northern Taranaki . . ."


--

Komata

"TVR - serving the Northern Taranaki . . . " ___________________________________________




Geep15T
Geep15T's picture
Posts: 35
Joined: 2008-04-28
Heres a little help

From what I can gather from new and old photos most crossings had one wig wag. Several still operate in illinois. check this guys sight for more info http://www.trainweb.org/dansrailpix/WIG_WAG_PAGE1c.htm

 




Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Powered by Drupal - Modified by Todd Vaules