Search:

Just a bit longer than it takes a stampedin' to reach you, I reckon!:D

I'll opt for #2; it's easier on the eyes, better contrast, easier to read.



You do realize, Gary Rowan, that you're setting yourself up for an epic Moose2013 stampede. For the love of...

Looking good! Those ore haulers are sure appealing. ...

And now I would like to return this thread to the Slate Fork branch. ...:D

Moose2013, I recommend RMWeb, which is hosted by Railway Modeller magazine. Lots of great modelers and modeling going on there.

The American board, I think, Rich_S. I don't recall for certain. I just deleted the post he got snarky about (wasn't his topic or a reply to his prior comment) and moved on. I won't be...

Well, I'm done with that UK N scale forum! Second post and I get some snarky response to a benign observation by an _sshat moderator who mistakes obtuseness as being clever. Not worth the...

Southern Railway section house and signal maintainer shed.

Awesome, orvio!

I think Moose exists on a higher plane of consciousness than do we mere two-legged bipeds, and I don't mean a 737!

Why is that moose wearing a silly grin on its face?

Love that rock work!

Wondering about that myself, Moose2013. I'm calling for an investigation. ...:D

And I sure know how that tune is played! I think the Slate Fork has around 200 trees on it.

I'm jealous. If I wasn't so doggone fond of the North Olympic Peninsula, I'd find that part of Vermont hard to say no to.

Somebody's been smokin' something!:D

Hi, Rich_S! Great to hear from you!

Yes, the Slate Fork is alive and well, and it's going through something of a scenery rejuvenation.

I'm also tweaking history a bit and placing Southern...

I think you're gaining ground, Moose!

Isn't that what the inventor of the parachute said when his first attempt failed?:D

What be it that Moose is testing, I wonder?

Unsolicited advice, so please dispense with as you see fit. Trees in our model worlds typically look better when grouped together in odd numbers -- three or five to up seven. Something about that...

Welcome to the forum! I'd opt for a 2x4' layout if you can, but 2x3 is doable. Google for a Model Railroader magazine article on the Cumberland & Ohio, featured in MR in January 1978. It was a 4x6 HO...

I'm right with you!

If it's not entirely plastic, you can't go wrong with thin CA for assembly. Apply sparingly. But I'd use liquid plastic cement/MEK for plastic joints.

As for instructions, e-mail Stewart and ask...

They are more of a niche locomotive than something that would attract broader support. Don't get me wrong: a GP10 would be a great thing for N scalers to have. So would an SD20 and an SDL39, but I...

Thank you, Vince, and welcome to the forum!