Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Gauntlet Track

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Lancaster, SC
    Posts
    788
    Blog Entries
    4
    Thanks
    341
    Thanked 1,062 Times in 455 Posts
    Mentioned
    31 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Gauntlet Track

    While reviewing this thread, I decided that it might be worthwhile to look at a related topic, gauntlet track. Gauntlet track was widely used for older scale tracks as was noted before, to keep the weight of locomotives off of the sensitive live scale tracks. It was also used for other purposes where it was helpful to move things slightly to the side for different purposes.

    Another application was when there was a turnout on a bridge, but it was desired to move the switch throw off of the bridge. An example is in this Google maps view: https://goo.gl/maps/H2vWvQsEFYzYzz1z6 This is a bridge in Greensboro, NC just west of the passenger station. You can see that the gauntlet section extended from the main part of the turnout across the bridge onto firm ground, where there was better room and access to the throw mechanism.
    Tim Rumph
    Modeling the Southern Railway in N-Scale

  2. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Tim R For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio
    Posts
    115
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 79 Times in 45 Posts
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    The PRR installed gauntlet track on the double track main from Pittsburgh to Columbus at tunnel number 5 Gould Tunnel in 1951. They did this due to freight car size increasing and to take advantage of the taller clearance at the center of the tunnel. Penn Central finally removed the gauntlet in 1975 and single tracked the tunnel.

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to bman For This Useful Post:


  5. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Ashburn, VA, USA
    Posts
    1,019
    Thanks
    203
    Thanked 1,306 Times in 427 Posts
    Mentioned
    22 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    That turn out is fascinating.
    --
    Leo Bicknell

  6. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Sequim WA
    Posts
    3,231
    Blog Entries
    1
    Thanks
    10,754
    Thanked 4,875 Times in 1,922 Posts
    Mentioned
    109 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    There is a photo in John Armstrong's "Track Planning for Realistic Operation" of a gauntlet track on a single-track bridge used by two competing railroads.

    Of course, you can't have trains running willy-nilly in that sort of situation, so I wonder if some sort of manual or automatic interlocking was used, or train order if TT/TO was in use.

    Oh, and go 'Canes! What a Bunch of Jerks! What a great OT win Wednesday night vs. the Capitals!

  7. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    Rochester, MN USA
    Posts
    393
    Thanks
    102
    Thanked 259 Times in 152 Posts
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Just as an aside, anytime I have read about this particular track arrangement, it was always referred to as "gantlet", not "gauntlet". I think it was the old railroaders who called it "gantlet"

    Doug
    Atlas First Generation Motive Power and Treble-O-Lectric. Click on the link:
    www.irwinsjournal.com/a1g/a1glocos/

  8. #6
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Cincy-whatzit, Ohio
    Posts
    6,821
    Blog Entries
    3
    Thanks
    9,276
    Thanked 8,390 Times in 3,687 Posts
    Mentioned
    211 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I always thought it was correctly termed "gantlet" track and that "gauntlet" was substituting a less-jargony common word, but from a quick bit of research it appears the two terms are used interchangeably. But since I'm the type of person who likes to use railroad-specific jargon with a smug look on my face, in my book it's "Gantlet".

    I love the use of this for a turnout on a bridge! Makes me want to find a place to do something like this on my layout. In fact, my Boyce Junction N-Trak module actually has the throwbar of a Peco turnout located on a bridge... Hmm. But would I want to change out that reliable Peco for some form of custom turnout that might be prone to derailments?

    Get yourself a Rail Pass for free travel on the WP&P: wpandp.com
    Could Star Wars: The Last Jedi have been a smarter movie with just one tweak? wpandp.com/how-an-interdictor-could-have-fixed-the-last-jedi/

  9. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Alberta
    Posts
    1,339
    Thanks
    3,645
    Thanked 1,231 Times in 728 Posts
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Gaunlet track was always signalled, occasionally with "smash boards" that would give positive indication:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gauntlet_track
    https://www.jonroma.net/signaling/ra...e%20B%26LE.pdf

  10. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Scotian_Huntress For This Useful Post:


  11. #8
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio
    Posts
    115
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 79 Times in 45 Posts
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Here is the track chart for the gauntlet track at tunnel number 5 for the PRR. It is on page 9. It's protected by position light signals on each side.

    http://www.multimodalways.org/docs/r...0TC%201950.pdf

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to bman For This Useful Post:


Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 22
    Last Post: 17th Jan 2019, 02:35 PM
  2. NEW TRACK PLANNING VIDEO: Double track vs. single track
    By DJSTRAINS in forum Layouts, Design, & Planning.
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 19th Dec 2014, 07:11 PM
  3. Replies: 8
    Last Post: 9th Sep 2013, 05:40 AM
  4. Replies: 10
    Last Post: 6th Jan 2012, 12:58 AM
  5. Replies: 23
    Last Post: 6th Sep 2011, 11:43 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •